0 8000 12 11

On February 18, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by A. Tovmasyan, had to hold a hearing on HCA Vanadzor v. RA Prosecutor General’s Office within the examination of the claim on compelling the RA Prosecutor General’s Office to provide the information requested by the Organization.

The court hearing was attended by plaintiff’s representative Tatevik Siradeghyan and Hayk Petrosyan, representative of the RA Prosecutor General’s Office. The identification and examination of Hayk Petrosyan’s powers showed that he was not duly authorized to act as the representative of the RA Prosecutor General’s Office under this case since he only held a letter assigning him the case.

Plaintiff’s representative T. Siradeghyan noted that according to the RA Code of Administrative Procedure, a person might act as a representative only if he held a power of attorney and did not object to adjourning the hearing.

Presiding judge A. Tovmasyan ruled to adjourn the court hearing, so that the representative of the RA Prosecutor General’s Office might submit a duly certified power of attorney. The parties to the trial will be further notified of the date and time of the next court hearing.

Note that by its claim submitted to the Court, HCA Vanadzor required to provide quantitative information as requested by the Organization’s inquiry of July 16, 2015 on the procedural decrees issued by the RA Special Investigation Service in 2013 and 2014 following the investigation of the crimes under Article 119, Article 309(2) and (3) and Article 341 of the RA Criminal Code.

See also: hcav.am